Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560 has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 560 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon Pro 560 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 177 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 480 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 138% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 220% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 362% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 40% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |