Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Oland |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 21 March 2018 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |