Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon PRO WX 3100 stacks up against Radeon R5 430 OEM, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 30% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 160% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Oland |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 21 March 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |