Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R7 M370
When choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M370, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M370.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 145 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 3600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Fortnite is 44% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Oland | Litho |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 June 2016 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |