Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R7 M465
When choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M465, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M465.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M465 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 95 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M465 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Oland | Litho XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 June 2016 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |