Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R9 370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R5 430 OEM stacks up against Radeon R9 370, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R9 370
Main Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Radeon R9 370 has 120% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 370 are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 195 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Trinidad |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 June 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |