Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R9 M295X
When comparing Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M295X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M295X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M295X has 400% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M295X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 7 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M295X.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M295X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M295X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M295X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Oland | Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 30 June 2016 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | Not Listed |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |