Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R5 430 OEM will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 156 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 1612 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 40% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Oland | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 June 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |