Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R5 430 OEM will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 394% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Radeon R5 430 OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 156 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 1468 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
55−60
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p
100−110
210−220
medium / 768p
80−85
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
21−24
65−70
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 220% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
80−85
high / 1080p
5−6
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 40% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p
12−14
60−65
medium / 768p
9−10
35−40
high / 1080p
5−6
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
27−30
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Full Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Oland
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
30 June 2016
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
730 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
18.72
32.14
Floating-point performance
599.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4600 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
36.8 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
