GeForce 940A vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 940A and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 940A stacks up against Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge, check out specs charts below.

Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:

Main Specs

  GeForce 940A Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 12-45 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price
  • GeForce 940A has 175% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
  • GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
  • GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
  • GeForce 940A and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 4−5 3−4
ultra / 1080p 2−3 1−2
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 14−16 14−16
medium / 1080p 5−6 5−6
GeForce 940A and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.

Full Specs

  GeForce 940A Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
Architecture Maxwell GCN 1.2/2.0
Code name GM108 Bristol Ridge
Type Desktop Laptop
Release date 13 March 2015 1 June 2016
Pipelines 384 384
Core clock speed 1029 MHz
Boost Clock 1124 MHz 800 MHz
Transistor count 3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 17.98
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB/s
Shared memory +
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 5.0
Laptop size medium sized
  Check Price