GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1233% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 110% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 52% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
Code name | GF114 | Bristol Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3100 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs UHD Graphics 630
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs UHD Graphics 617
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 630
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 617