Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
When choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 441% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 310% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 88% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 342% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 184% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Bristol Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 1 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3100 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |