Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12-45 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1883% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is build with GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 271% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. |
Full Specs
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Bristol Ridge | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3100 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 630
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 617
- Tesla C2070 vs UHD Graphics 630
- Tesla C2070 vs UHD Graphics 617
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost