FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R5 M435
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R5 M435 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 M435 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Radeon R5 M435
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R5 M435 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R5 M435 are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 65 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal | Jet |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |