FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R5 M435
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R5 M435, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M5950 stacks up against Radeon R5 M435, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 M435
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 M435 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 55 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 3600 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 46% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| FirePro M5950 and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |