GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R5 M435
When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R5 M435, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R5 M435 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 M435
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 M435 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 720 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in World of Tanks is 84% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N10E-GS1 | Jet |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 64 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |