GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R5 M435
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R5 M435 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 M435 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 M435
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R5 M435 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 230 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 3550 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 47% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 105% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 43% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | NB9E-GTX | Jet |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 224 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |