GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R5 M435
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R5 M435, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R5 M435.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon R5 M435
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 M435 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 520 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 105% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 106% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 333% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 43% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | Jet |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |