GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon R5 M435
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670M and Radeon R5 M435 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 M435 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 M435
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 182 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 47% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 37% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | Jet |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |