GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon R5 M435
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M and Radeon R5 M435 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 M435 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 M435
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 17 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- GeForce GTX 860M and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 516% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 457% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 206% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 75% more, than Radeon R5 M435. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15P-GX | Jet |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |