GRID K160Q vs Radeon R5 M435
When comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon R5 M435, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R5 M435 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R5 M435
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 M435 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 70 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 2718 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Jet |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |