GRID K240Q vs Radeon R5 M435
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon R5 M435 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 M435 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R5 M435
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 M435 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 35 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 283% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K240Q and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 126% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 271% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 48% more, than Radeon R5 M435. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Jet |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |