GRID K260Q vs Radeon R5 M435
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R5 M435, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon R5 M435, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Radeon R5 M435
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R5 M435 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 35 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 466% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 123% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 104% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 533% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 72% more, than Radeon R5 M435. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Jet |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |