Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R5 M435
When comparing Quadro M2000M and Radeon R5 M435, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R5 M435 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 M435
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 258 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 566% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 143% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 266% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 528% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 666% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |