Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R5 M435
When comparing Quadro M2200 and Radeon R5 M435, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2200 and Radeon R5 M435 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 M435
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 86 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 1008 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 733% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2200 and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 147% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 333% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 300% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 1450% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 866% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1020% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |