Quadro M3000M vs Radeon R5 M435
When comparing Quadro M3000M and Radeon R5 M435, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M3000M and Radeon R5 M435 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 M435
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 270 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Quadro M3000M and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M3000M and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 216% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro M3000M and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon R5 M435. |
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Jet |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |