Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R5 M435
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R5 M435, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 460 stacks up against Radeon R5 M435, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 M435
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 120 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 566% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 138% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |