Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R5 M435
In this comparison between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R5 M435 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 M435 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 M435
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R5 M435 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 March 2018 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |