Radeon R5 M435 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon R5 M435 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R5 M435 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 M435
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
Radeon R5 M435 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Radeon R5 M435 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R5 M435 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 206 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 1368 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 53% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Radeon R5 M435. |
Full Specs
Radeon R5 M435 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Jet | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 May 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 320 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
Transistor count | 690 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |