Radeon R6 Carrizo vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Radeon R6 Carrizo and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R6 Carrizo and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R6 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R6 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R6 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R6 Carrizo | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-35 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1883% more power consumption, than Radeon R6 Carrizo.
- Radeon R6 Carrizo is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R6 Carrizo is build with GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon R6 Carrizo is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 428% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 387% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 206% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 666% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 450% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R6 Carrizo | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Carrizo | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2410 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |