GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R7 250
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 250, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against Radeon R7 250, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
N/A
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 250 has 25% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 250 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 250 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 250 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
14−16
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−11
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
9−10
medium / 1080p
−
4−5
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
high / 1080p
27−30
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
0−1
18−20
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
G9x
GCN
Code name
N10E-GS1
Oland XT
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
2 March 2009
1 October 2013
Pipelines
64
384
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
25.20
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
168 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
PCIe 3.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
117 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price