GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon R7 250
When choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon R7 250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon R7 250.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
N/A
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 78% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R7 250 is 159 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 250 is 1144 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
3−4
ultra / 1080p
9−10
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
27−30
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−33
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 288% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
210−220
120−130
medium / 768p
180−190
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
45−50
QHD / 1440p
60−65
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−35
−
high / 768p
150−160
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
110−120
80−85
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
ultra / 1080p
70−75
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
20−22
4−5
ultra / 1080p
18−20
4−5
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−12
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
12−14
1−2
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 170% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
27−30
8−9
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
80−85
35−40
high / 1080p
30−35
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 129% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
10−11
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
9−10
medium / 1080p
14−16
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 250.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
7−8
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
60−65
18−20
medium / 768p
35−40
12−14
high / 1080p
21−24
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon R7 250.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
Kepler
GCN
Code name
GK106
Oland XT
Type
Desktop
Desktop
Release date
26 March 2013
1 October 2013
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
25.20
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
168 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
117 Mh/s
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price