GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R7 250
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R7 250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
N/A
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 250 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 250 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
3−4
ultra / 1080p
4−5
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
90−95
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
27−30
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
80−85
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
80−85
80−85
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
8−9
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
60−65
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
12−14
8−9
ultra / 1080p
10−12
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
12−14
8−9
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
1−2
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
9−10
medium / 1080p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
high / 1080p
90−95
85−90
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
7−8
medium / 1080p
10−12
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
24−27
18−20
medium / 768p
16−18
12−14
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
85−90
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
high / 768p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon R7 250.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
Kepler
GCN
Code name
N13E-GE
Oland XT
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
22 March 2012
1 October 2013
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
835 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
30.4 billion/sec
25.20
Floating-point performance
729.6 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
168 mm
Memory bus width
128bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
PCIe 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
36 Mh/s
117 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
