GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon R7 250
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon R7 250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
N/A
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 250 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
160−170
120−130
medium / 768p
130−140
90−95
ultra / 1080p
70−75
45−50
QHD / 1440p
40−45
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
10−12
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
75−80
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 59% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
16−18
8−9
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
65−70
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
1−2
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
9−10
medium / 1080p
8−9
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
7−8
medium / 1080p
12−14
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
35−40
18−20
medium / 768p
21−24
12−14
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon R7 250.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
Kepler
GCN
Code name
N14-GE
Oland XT
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
30 May 2013
1 October 2013
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
850 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.23
25.20
Floating-point performance
1,326 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
168 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
PCIe 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
117 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price