GRID K240Q vs Radeon R7 250
When choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 250.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GRID K240Q
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
N/A
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 250 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
3−4
ultra / 1080p
6−7
1−2
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 144% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
170−180
120−130
medium / 768p
140−150
90−95
ultra / 1080p
75−80
45−50
QHD / 1440p
40−45
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
110−120
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
95−100
80−85
medium / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−12
4−5
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
75−80
50−55
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 68% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
65−70
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
high / 1080p
20−22
8−9
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
7−8
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
9−10
medium / 1080p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−105
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
7−8
medium / 1080p
12−14
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
35−40
18−20
medium / 768p
24−27
12−14
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Radeon R7 250.
Full Specs
GRID K240Q
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
Kepler
GCN
Code name
GK104
Oland XT
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
28 June 2013
1 October 2013
Pipelines
1536
384
Core clock speed
745 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
25.20
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
168 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
117 Mh/s
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price