GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 250

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 250, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Radeon R7 250, check out specs charts below.

GRID K520

Radeon R7 250 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	N/A
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
		Check Price

GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
GRID K520 and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 99 mm longer, than Radeon R7 250.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	20−22	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	6−7
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	45−50
QHD / 1440p	55−60	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−35	−
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	110−120	80−85
medium / 768p	95−100	55−60
ultra / 1080p	65−70	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	18−20	4−5
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	27−30	10−12
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 170% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	27−30	8−9
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	10−11	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	3−4
low / 720p	55−60	21−24
medium / 1080p	30−35	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	80−85	35−40
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 129% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	8−9	1−2
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	9−10
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	7−8
medium / 1080p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	60−65	18−20
medium / 768p	35−40	12−14
high / 1080p	20−22	6−7
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Radeon R7 250.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon R7 250
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	GK104	Oland XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013	1 October 2013
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	25.20
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	716.8 gflops
Length	267 mm	168 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s	117 Mh/s
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration		+
		Check Price

GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 250

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares