Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R7 250
When comparing Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 250, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 250 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
N/A
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 250 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 250 - in Desktops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 250 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 250 is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
14−16
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−11
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
9−10
medium / 1080p
−
4−5
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
high / 1080p
27−30
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
0−1
18−20
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
Fermi
GCN
Code name
Fermi
Oland XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
22 February 2011
1 October 2013
Pipelines
192
384
Core clock speed
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
25.20
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
168 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.1
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
117 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price