Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 250

When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 250, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 250 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro FX 3800

Radeon R7 250 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	N/A
Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250.
Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 250 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 250 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro FX 3800 is 30 mm longer, than Radeon R7 250.
Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 450 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	3−4
ultra / 1080p	0−1	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	14−16
medium / 1080p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	2−3	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	18−20
medium / 1080p	2−3	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	75−80	90−95
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	9−10	−
high / 768p	50−55	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	65−70	80−85
medium / 768p	40−45	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Dota 2 is 36% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	7−8	14−16
medium / 1080p	2−3	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	4−5	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	35−40	45−50
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	1−2	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	0−1	2−3
ultra / 1080p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	9−10
medium / 1080p	−	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
high / 1080p	50−55	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	7−8
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	4−5	18−20
medium / 768p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	2−3	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	70−75
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−12	16−18
high / 768p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 250
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN
Code name	GT200B	Oland XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2009	1 October 2013
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	600 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	38.40	25.20
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	716.8 gflops
Length	198 mm	168 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	1.3
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		117 Mh/s
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration		+
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 250

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares