Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 250

When choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 250.

Quadro K2200M

Radeon R7 250 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	N/A
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
		Check Price

Radeon R7 250 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3862 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	1−2
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	24−27	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	30−35	6−7
ultra / 1080p	27−30	4−5
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	18−20
medium / 1080p	35−40	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 355% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	120−130
medium / 768p	200−210	90−95
ultra / 1080p	110−120	45−50
QHD / 1440p	85−90	24−27
4K / 2160p	45−50	−
high / 768p	160−170	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 126% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	55−60	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
medium / 768p	100−110	55−60
ultra / 1080p	75−80	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	2−3
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	24−27	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	30−35	10−12
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
QHD / 1440p	14−16	1−2
low / 720p	120−130	50−55
medium / 1080p	70−75	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 217% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
QHD / 1440p	12−14	3−4
4K / 2160p	12−14	3−4
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	90−95	35−40
high / 1080p	40−45	8−9
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 166% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−11	1−2
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	9−10
medium / 1080p	16−18	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	120−130	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon R7 250.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	7−8
medium / 1080p	20−22	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	70−75	18−20
medium / 768p	45−50	12−14
high / 1080p	24−27	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	40−45	16−18
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon R7 250.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Radeon R7 250
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN
Code name	GM107	Oland XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	19 July 2014	1 October 2013
Pipelines	640	384
Core clock speed	667 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	25.20
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	716.8 gflops
Length		168 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		117 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		3 Mh/s
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+
AppAcceleration		+
		Check Price

Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 250

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares