Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R7 250
When comparing Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 250, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 250 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
N/A
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 250 has 25% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
Quadro T2000 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro T2000 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 250.
Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 250 - in Desktops.
Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 250 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 6850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
3−4
ultra / 1080p
21−24
1−2
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
14−16
medium / 1080p
40−45
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
55−60
6−7
ultra / 1080p
45−50
4−5
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
18−20
medium / 1080p
60−65
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
120−130
medium / 768p
220−230
90−95
ultra / 1080p
180−190
45−50
QHD / 1440p
110−120
24−27
4K / 2160p
70−75
−
high / 768p
210−220
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 180% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
120−130
80−85
medium / 768p
110−120
55−60
ultra / 1080p
100−110
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 105% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
45−50
4−5
ultra / 1080p
40−45
4−5
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
2−3
low / 720p
80−85
14−16
medium / 1080p
45−50
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
60−65
10−12
ultra / 1080p
45−50
7−8
QHD / 1440p
27−30
1−2
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
50−55
medium / 1080p
110−120
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 411% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
60−65
8−9
ultra / 1080p
45−50
7−8
QHD / 1440p
30−35
3−4
4K / 2160p
24−27
3−4
low / 720p
100−110
21−24
medium / 1080p
65−70
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
140−150
45−50
medium / 768p
120−130
35−40
high / 1080p
70−75
8−9
ultra / 1080p
30−35
4−5
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 287% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
20−22
1−2
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
9−10
medium / 1080p
30−35
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
130−140
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon R7 250.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
16−18
3−4
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
7−8
medium / 1080p
35−40
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
130−140
18−20
medium / 768p
85−90
12−14
high / 1080p
45−50
6−7
ultra / 1080p
24−27
4−5
4K / 2160p
16−18
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
50−55
16−18
high / 768p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 250.
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
Turing
GCN
Code name
N19P-Q3
Oland XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
27 May 2019
1 October 2013
Pipelines
1024
384
Core clock speed
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
114.2
25.20
Floating-point performance
716.8 gflops
Length
168 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
117 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price