FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 250X

In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 250X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro M4150

Radeon R7 250X Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 250X
Power consumption (TDP)		80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 250X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 250X has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 250X are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 250X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2375 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	24−27
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	5−6	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	6−7	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	120−130	180−190
medium / 768p	90−95	150−160
ultra / 1080p	35−40	75−80
QHD / 1440p	21−24	45−50
4K / 2160p	16−18	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	45−50	80−85
ultra / 1080p	20−22	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Dota 2 is 60% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
4K / 2160p	2−3	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	30−33
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	20−22
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	−
low / 720p	50−55	80−85
medium / 1080p	10−12	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Fortnite is 110% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	3−4	5−6
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	4−5	21−24
medium / 1080p	3−4	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	95−100
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	40−45
medium / 768p	8−9	24−27
high / 1080p	4−5	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	95−100
medium / 768p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 250X
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Opal	Cape Verde
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	16 October 2013	13 February 2014
Pipelines	384	640
Core clock speed	715 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16	38.00
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops	1,216 gflops
Length		210 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	96 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		152 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 250X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares