FirePro V5900 vs Radeon R7 250X

In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Radeon R7 250X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Radeon R7 250X Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Radeon R7 250X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 250X has 6% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V5900 and Radeon R7 250X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Radeon R7 250X - with GCN 1.0.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 250X - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V5900 is 20 mm longer, than Radeon R7 250X.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 375 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	10−12
ultra / 1080p	2−3	6−7
QHD / 1440p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	24−27
medium / 1080p	7−8	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−12	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5900 and Radeon R7 250X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	180−190
medium / 768p	100−110	150−160
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
QHD / 1440p	24−27	45−50
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	80−85
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	12−14
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	30−33
medium / 1080p	7−8	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Far Cry 5 is 87% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	20−22
ultra / 1080p	0−1	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Fortnite is 71% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	7−8
ultra / 1080p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	21−24
medium / 1080p	4−5	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	20−22
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	9−10	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 145% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	21−24
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	40−45
medium / 768p	12−14	24−27
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	40−45	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Radeon R7 250X
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 1.0
Code name	Cayman	Cape Verde
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	24 May 2011	13 February 2014
Pipelines	512	640
Core clock speed	600 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	38.00
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	1,216 gflops
Length	230 mm	210 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	96 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	152 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Radeon R7 250X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares