GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 250X

In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 250X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K160Q

Radeon R7 250X Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 250X
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 62% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250X.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R7 250X has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250X - with GCN 1.0.
GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 250X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 157 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	9−10	24−27
medium / 1080p	1−2	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	8−9	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Battlefield 5 is 550% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	100−110	180−190
medium / 768p	75−80	150−160
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
QHD / 1440p	−	45−50
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−33
high / 768p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	95−100
medium / 768p	35−40	80−85
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Dota 2 is 92% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	6−7	30−33
medium / 1080p	1−2	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	80−85
medium / 1080p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Fortnite is 169% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
high / 1080p	50−55	−
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2100% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	40−45
medium / 768p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	95−100
medium / 768p	30−35	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−11	27−30
high / 768p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 250X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK107	Cape Verde
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	13 February 2014
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	850 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	38.00
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,216 gflops
Length		210 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	96 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		152 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 250X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares