Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 250X
When comparing Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 250X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 250X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M
Radeon R7 250X
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
80 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 250X has 77% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 250X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 250X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 250X - in Desktops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250X - with GCN 1.0.
Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 250X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
1−2
24−27
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
20−22
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p
60−65
180−190
medium / 768p
27−30
150−160
ultra / 1080p
7−8
75−80
QHD / 1440p
−
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 375% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
10−11
80−85
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Dota 2 is 210% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
30−33
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Fortnite is 272% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
low / 768p
18−20
70−75
medium / 768p
−
60−65
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
95−100
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
40−45
medium / 768p
−
24−27
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
high / 768p
12−14
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M
Radeon R7 250X
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Code name
N14P-Q1
Cape Verde
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
1 June 2012
13 February 2014
Pipelines
192
640
Core clock speed
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
38.00
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
1,216 gflops
Length
210 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
152 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Check Price
Check Price