Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R7 250X

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 250X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M2000 stacks up against Radeon R7 250X, check out specs charts below.

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Radeon R7 250X Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro M2000	Radeon R7 250X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 250X has 6% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 250X.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 250X - with GCN 1.0.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 250X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R7 250X is 9 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4987 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	10−12
ultra / 1080p	12−14	6−7
QHD / 1440p	6−7	1−2
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	24−27
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
high / 1080p	30−35	18−20
ultra / 1080p	27−30	16−18
QHD / 1440p	12−14	2−3
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	35−40	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	230−240	180−190
medium / 768p	200−210	150−160
ultra / 1080p	120−130	75−80
QHD / 1440p	90−95	45−50
4K / 2160p	50−55	30−33
high / 768p	170−180	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	30−35
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	120−130	95−100
medium / 768p	100−110	80−85
ultra / 1080p	80−85	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	5−6
low / 720p	50−55	30−33
medium / 1080p	27−30	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
high / 1080p	30−35	20−22
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	120−130	80−85
medium / 1080p	70−75	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 57% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
high / 1080p	35−40	18−20
ultra / 1080p	27−30	16−18
QHD / 1440p	14−16	5−6
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	70−75	40−45
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	95−100	60−65
high / 1080p	40−45	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−11	5−6
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	120−130	100−110
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	70−75	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	40−45	21−24
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 64% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	75−80	40−45
medium / 768p	45−50	24−27
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	9−10
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than Radeon R7 250X.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
medium / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	27−30
high / 768p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon R7 250X.

Full Specs

	Quadro M2000	Radeon R7 250X
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	GM206	Cape Verde
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	8 April 2016	13 February 2014
Pipelines	768	640
Core clock speed	796 MHz
Boost Clock	1163 MHz	1000 MHz
Transistor count	2,940 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	55.82	38.00
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	1,216 gflops
Length	201 mm	210 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth		96 GB/s
DirectX	12
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+
CUDA	5.2
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	215 Mh/s	152 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R7 250X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares