FirePro M4100 vs Radeon R7 260

In this comparison between FirePro M4100 and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro M4100 Check Price

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:

FirePro M4100 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M4100	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)		115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro M4100 and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260 - in Desktops.
FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro M4100 and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 2375 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M4100 and Radeon R7 260 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	200−210
medium / 768p	95−100	170−180
ultra / 1080p	40−45	95−100
QHD / 1440p	24−27	50−55
4K / 2160p	18−20	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	85−90	55−60
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	24−27	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	2−3	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 162% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	4−5	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	7−8	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	1−2	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	5−6	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 27% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	12−14	50−55
medium / 768p	9−10	30−35
high / 1080p	4−5	18−20
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than FirePro M4100.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4100	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	GCN	GCN 2.0
Code name	Mars	Bonaire
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2013	17 December 2013
Pipelines	384	768
Core clock speed	670 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	16.08	48.00
Floating-point performance	514.6 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	104 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	74 Mh/s	240 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M4100 vs Radeon R7 260

FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares