FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 260

When comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 260, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 260 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro M4150

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)		115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2375 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	120−130	200−210
medium / 768p	90−95	170−180
ultra / 1080p	35−40	95−100
QHD / 1440p	21−24	50−55
4K / 2160p	16−18	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	90−95
ultra / 1080p	20−22	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	10−12	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 162% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	3−4	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	4−5	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	50−55
medium / 768p	8−9	30−35
high / 1080p	4−5	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Opal	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	16 October 2013	17 December 2013
Pipelines	384	768
Core clock speed	715 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16	48.00
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		240 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 260

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares