GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 260

When comparing GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 260, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 260 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K160Q

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 13% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 260.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R7 260 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 157 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	9−10	30−35
medium / 1080p	1−2	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	1−2	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	8−9	50−55
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 725% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	100−110	200−210
medium / 768p	75−80	170−180
ultra / 1080p	30−35	95−100
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−33
high / 768p	50−55	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	35−40	90−95
ultra / 1080p	14−16	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	1−2	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	95−100
medium / 1080p	3−4	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 226% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	3−4	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 135% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2700% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1066% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	100−110
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	35−40
high / 768p	27−30	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Code name	GK107	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	17 December 2013
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	850 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	48.00
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		240 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 260

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares