NVS 810 vs Radeon R7 260

In this comparison between NVS 810 and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  NVS 810 Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 115 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 8x mini-DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon R7 260 has 69% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • NVS 810 and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
  • NVS 810 and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • NVS 810 is 28 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260.
  • Memory clock speed of NVS 810 is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 2−3 14−16
ultra / 1080p 1−2 8−9
QHD / 1440p 0−1 3−4
low / 720p 12−14 30−35
medium / 1080p 4−5 18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

  NVS 810 Radeon R7 260
Architecture Maxwell GCN 2.0
Code name GM107 Bonaire
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 4 November 2015 17 December 2013
Pipelines 512 768
Core clock speed 902 MHz
Boost Clock 1033 MHz 1100 MHz
Transistor count 1,870 million 2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 33.06 48.00
Floating-point performance 2x 1,058 gflops 1,536 gflops
Length 198 mm 170 mm
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB/s 104 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 5.0
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 240 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
Design reference
DisplayPort support +
DDMA audio +
  Check Price Check Price