NVS 810 vs Radeon R7 260
In this comparison between NVS 810 and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
NVS 810
Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260 has 69% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
NVS 810 and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 28 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260.
Memory clock speed of NVS 810 is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
14−16
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
50−55
medium / 1080p
6−7
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
95−100
170−180
ultra / 1080p
40−45
95−100
QHD / 1440p
21−24
50−55
4K / 2160p
16−18
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
90−95
ultra / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
95−100
medium / 1080p
10−12
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 162% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
−
75−80
high / 1080p
4−5
27−30
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
4−5
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 28% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
50−55
medium / 768p
8−9
30−35
high / 1080p
4−5
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Radeon R7 260
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 2.0
Code name
GM107
Bonaire
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
4 November 2015
17 December 2013
Pipelines
512
768
Core clock speed
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
48.00
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
1,536 gflops
Length
198 mm
170 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
104 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
240 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
DDMA audio
+
Check Price
Check Price