Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R7 260
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 260, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 2000M stacks up against Radeon R7 260, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M
Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260 has 109% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260 - in Desktops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 260 is 725 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
1−2
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
60−65
200−210
medium / 768p
27−30
170−180
ultra / 1080p
7−8
95−100
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
90−95
ultra / 1080p
0−1
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
95−100
medium / 1080p
0−1
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
0−1
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
27−30
low / 768p
18−20
85−90
medium / 768p
−
75−80
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
55−60
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
0−1
50−55
medium / 768p
−
30−35
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M
Radeon R7 260
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 2.0
Code name
Fermi
Bonaire
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
22 February 2011
17 December 2013
Pipelines
192
768
Core clock speed
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
48.00
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
1,536 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
104 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.1
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
240 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
DDMA audio
+
Check Price
Check Price